To extreme to be considered even Neoliberal

When I was asked about Covid-19 and the after chaos, I answered that the crisis will sure come, and the crisis will be completely devastator but if the market can work for itself, the self regulation of the market will be self sustained. 

Let's start each part, the state is using literaly the biochaotic situation to promote itself as the savior, only capable to limitate private actions and limit the contamination numbers, and the self proclamation of highest authority, the states are using the police power and the auto-regulamentation to use economies to steal the money from the banks to the politicians. 

The acquiring without biding is common, and the contract of the outsourcing companies, subsidiary to the congressmen to promote the control of population. In general during warfare/pandemic states there is overtax of bills, outsourcing of public services to private companies without the legal contract, the creation of new taxes, financial support to great companies, and the high number of unemployment.

Trump administration and others, like Bolsonaro, are close to the Austrian School of Economy, that promotes neoliberalism and the capability of outsource the most part of the state, promoting the charge of taxes to support market and industry. But the market can re-invent itself with the chaos. That's the chaordic path. Chaos is the door to the new success and the Darwinism can show how the survival of the fittest can be a part in economic sector too.

There are means to the objectives of the company. During the chaos, the market can re-structure itself to new pillars, using applications, changing the way of attending people, promoting new sanitarian politics, using new methods of delivery instead of receive people, home office, home classroom. Service sector is growing more with the chaos scenario and the market is using the new service sectors to promote the re-adjustment of itself.

To understand more it, the extremist to be a neoliberal, Murray Rothbard can explain more than Austrian School, that considered him to extreme to be considered neoliberal. The anarchism at capitlaism can explore more the highest scenario and can adapt itself. Market and private sector can re-invent itself and can take control of the chaotic situation and bankrupt. But the limitation of the market and private sector can be the State that will use this situation to overtax the new-service sectors to promote gains and support government itself, and use it to promote politicians personaly, attaking opposition.

Anarcho-capitalism is supposed to have no rule of law against the market, while the market can adjust itself, with self regulation of each particular, with common salaries, common services, cover the gaps of society with the money running free from the public agent in limitation of private demand/offer of service.

The private was supposed to have the right to chose how to work and it should be considered a crime to pay to work, with these taxes, the control of the private life and limitation of freedom of work, making the bureaucratic agents always at the top, and promoting a society under the control and slaves of the debts.

The anarchic state is supposed to have hierarchicaly and subdivision, but can rule itself, not with leaders to decide who and how to work, charging money to give freedom, as man is a natural being that is naturaly free.